Subject: | Re: MAPI Mail
| Date: | Tue, 26 Nov 2019 07:28:52 -0500
| From: | "Steven Green" <greens@diamondsg.com>
| Newsgroups: | pnews.paradox-development
|
all great points, guys.. thanks
we have a simple alternative, we're passing the strings (send to, cc,
subject, message body, etc) to another little app that pushes it all
directly thru the ISP.. bypassing the direct interaction with Outlook and
its' MAPI interface.. only one customer reported a problem so far, and
updating an SSL certificate took care of that
our actual content is the heart of the problem.. we frequently have
attachments, often have html code, our vendor batches even have a submit
button buried in the html code.. so yeah, we understand why there's a
problem :-)
the only remaining stumbling block is getting this alternative to create an
entry in the Sent box.. but we'll figure it out
--
Steven Green
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
http://www.OasisTradingPost.com
Collectibles and Memorabilia
Vintage Lego Sets and Parts
- and Paradox support, too
"Steven Green" wrote in message news:5dd8213d$1@pnews.thedbcommunity.com...
the big app I'm working on uses the paradox mail function heavily, in house
and externally.. just finally consolidated his mail stuff into one central
process.. there were over 100 separate mail calls in the app
anyhow.. Win10 doesn't like 3rd-party MAPI calls, and is now throwing up a
password confirmation box, sometimes.. if you don't enter your password, it
sends an error back to paradox, and the email isn't sent
and FYI for those who don't use the mail function, and are reading this for
casual knowledge, you can't trap for true/false on the send() function.. and
it seems it returns true all the time on the sendDLG() function, even if you
don't send the email yourself.. it's essentially a black box
right now, three people are getting that often but not every time, over the
course of the day, and a couple of people are starting to get it
occasionally.. researching the hell out of it, but not having much luck.. no
specific clue as to why these particular people are getting it, and others
doing the same stuff are not.. it's a terminal server setup, so they're all
running in the same environment, in theory
we're almost done with the alternative, now that we have one central process
to replace, but in the meantime.. anyone else dealing with this? any clues?
--
Steven Green
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
http://www.OasisTradingPost.com
Collectibles and Memorabilia
Vintage Lego Sets and Parts
- and Paradox support, too
|