Subject: | Re: oplocks etc
| Date: | Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:19:13 -0500
| From: | "Steven Green" <greens@diamondsg.com>
| Newsgroups: | pnews.paradox-development
|
thanks, Tom.. good food for thought.. like I told somebody else this
morning, elsewhere, we really don't have a big enough base anymore to be
able to really test and confirm much of anything, except by trial and error
--
Steven Green
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
http://www.OasisTradingPost.com
Collectibles and Memorabilia
Vintage Lego Sets and Parts
- and Paradox support, too
"Tom Krieg" wrote in message news:5e1d0db4@pnews.thedbcommunity.com...
I've never used Paradox with SMB2 over a network. But there have been a
few posts here on the groups about corruption and file header problems
and that it basically doesn't work. I could be wrong but I'm guessing
something built for SMB1 isn't going to work with SMB2.
On 14/01/2020 7:40 am, Steven Green wrote:
> so those are the risks of smb1.. what are the known problems for paradox
> interacting with smb2, if any?
>
> --
|