Subject: | Re: date grief
| Date: | Mon, 11 Dec 2017 23:14:08 +0000
| From: | Michael Kennedy <Info@KennedySoftware.ie>
| Newsgroups: | pnews.paradox-dos
|
Sorry for the delay, Leslie.
Thank you for all your considered remarks.
> I have been looking through my archives for the QBE specification this
> afternoon and have not had any luck at this time. I do have a copy of
> the book "Paradox Queries" by Dan Ehrmann but Bernie wants a Paradox for
> DOS specification which makes that one too modern.
I think Dan did two books, which I think I have - so, if you want me to
look up anything, let me know.
>> And, I've always had huge respect for the folks who developed the
>> internal ISAM/B-Tree handling, record locking, etc.
>
> How it works is nothing special really, in fact quite common back then.
Well, there are standard algos, but real-life implementations can get a
bit messy - support for Soundex, maintain high-density (balanced) index
blocks (for faster retrieval, but slower Inserts/Deletes), etc. And I've
used a few B-Tree libraries that had reproducible bugs in them!
> I co-wrote something similar back in the late 80's which we used in
> parallel with Btrieve 3.5/4.0.
>
> I have rewritten that library twice since then as I use it in other
> applications today. It does super-fast data retrieval (faster than
> Paradox actually) and does not need an engine like the BDE...
Well Done!!
- Mike
|