Subject: | Re: CHECK and CHECKPLUS
| Date: | Sat, 7 Apr 2018 08:24:38 +1000
| From: | Bernie van't Hof <berniev@bje.com.au>
| Newsgroups: | pnews.paradox-dos
|
I dunno. Last time this was discussed it was 12? (!)
On 7/4/18 1:51 am, Steven Green wrote:
> pdoxwin qbe is exactly the same.. doesn't matter where you post questions, how many of
us do you think there really are?
> :-)
>
>
> --
>
> Steven Green
> Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
>
> http://www.OasisTradingPost.com
>
> Collectibles and Memorabilia
> Vintage Lego Sets and Parts
> - and Paradox support, too
> "Bernie van't Hof" wrote in message news:5ac79079$1@pnews.thedbcommunity.com...
>
> Thanks Steve,
>
> I can see it can be done in sql using groups etc, but my problem, as usual, is remembering
how pdox worked.
>
> Not is not an issue.
>
> Is pdoxwin similar re qbe? Maybe I should ask this in another section?
>
> - Bernie
>
> On 7/4/18 12:43 am, Steven Green wrote:
>> I haven't played with that in many years, but my guess is that paradox allowing a checkplus
in selected fields, as
>> apposed to all or nothing, is not reproducable in SQL.. probably done internally, the
same way the "not" query is
>> done.. create a too-big answer set, then reduce it, then display it
>>
>> easier to explain with the "not" query.. it grabs everything the query requests, then
does the "not" step separately..
>> you can can see that by testing the size of the answer table.. it might be empty, but
it'll still be the size it was
>> before it removed all the "not" records
>>
>> --
>>
>> Steven Green
>> Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
>>
>> http://www.OasisTradingPost.com
>>
>> Collectibles and Memorabilia
>> Vintage Lego Sets and Parts
>> - and Paradox support, too
>> "Bernie van't Hof" wrote in message news:5ac72161$1@pnews.thedbcommunity.com...
>>
>> Pdox allows a query to contain both CHECK's and CHECKPLUS's which roughly translate
to SELECT DISTINCT and SELECT in sql.
>>
>> sql does not allow both in the same query due to possible uncertainties/ambiguities.
>>
>> I thought I had this nailed, but on closer inspection it seems my recollection of how
pdox works in this regard is not
>> so clear, although I do remember sometimes struggling to get the mix right.
>>
>> Anyone help?
>>
>> - Bernie
>
|