Subject: | Re: One detail too hard
| Date: | Sun, 5 Aug 2018 07:55:03 -0400
| From: | "Steven Green" <greens@diamondsg.com>
| Newsgroups: | pnews.paradox-dos
|
just an FYI.. in the app I'm working on right now, there are several
instances of the "fail" line.. it works in p9/10/11.. I'd have to look, to
find examples in pdoxdos, but I'll take your word for it
--
Steven Green
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
http://www.OasisTradingPost.com
Collectibles and Memorabilia
Vintage Lego Sets and Parts
- and Paradox support, too
"Bernie van't Hof" wrote in message
news:5b6314dd$1@pnews.thedbcommunity.com...
Cleaning up variable scoping and found an issue, but I'm not sure its worth
worrying about..
Query
Ordindhx | Date |
| ~CurrDate |
Endquery
CHECK
[Ordinddx(Q)->DD#] = "_d,~CurrDD" ; <<=== fails
[Ordindhx(Q)->CN#] = CurrCN
Do_It!
If CurrDD is defined outside current function scope it will fail.
Workaround is to use = "_d," + CurrDD.
Is this worth chasing?
- Bernie
|