Paradox Community

Items in pnews.paradox-dos

Subject:Re: One detail too hard
Date:Sun, 5 Aug 2018 07:55:03 -0400
From:"Steven Green" <greens@diamondsg.com>
Newsgroups:pnews.paradox-dos
just an FYI.. in the app I'm working on right now, there are several 
instances of the "fail" line.. it works in p9/10/11.. I'd have to look, to 
find examples in pdoxdos, but I'll take your word for it


--

Steven Green
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA

http://www.OasisTradingPost.com

Collectibles and Memorabilia
Vintage Lego Sets and Parts
- and Paradox support, too
"Bernie van't Hof"  wrote in message 
news:5b6314dd$1@pnews.thedbcommunity.com...

Cleaning up variable scoping and found an issue, but I'm not sure its worth 
worrying about..

Query

   Ordindhx | Date      |
            | ~CurrDate |

Endquery
CHECK
[Ordinddx(Q)->DD#] = "_d,~CurrDD"  ; <<=== fails
[Ordindhx(Q)->CN#] = CurrCN
Do_It!


If CurrDD is defined outside current function scope it will fail.

Workaround is to use = "_d," + CurrDD.

Is this worth chasing?

- Bernie 


Copyright © 2004 thedbcommunity.com