Paradox Community

Items in pnews.paradox-programming

Subject:Re: advmatch for email
Date:Fri, 11 May 2018 13:39:07 -0400
From:"Steven Green" <greens@diamondsg.com>
Newsgroups:pnews.paradox-programming
failed to be FALSE.. I run that advmatch on large batch emails that Debbie 
sends out, for trade shows and such, to clean the raw input.. there were 15 
of the "@" ones, and 4 of the "dot" ones in an 80,000 record table, maybe 
neither pattern had actually appeared in batches before

so you think changing all the * to + will take care of it?


--

Steven Green
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA

http://www.OasisTradingPost.com

Collectibles and Memorabilia
Vintage Lego Sets and Parts
- and Paradox support, too
"Mark Bannister"  wrote in message 
news:5af5d1c8$1@pnews.thedbcommunity.com...

Failed to catch as in those should be considered valid?
Oh, wait, yes the "*" should be "+"
^([^\\@]+)\\@([^\\@.]+).([^\\@]+)$

On 5/11/2018 11:59 AM, Steven Green wrote:
> yesterday, it failed to catch "name@gmail."
>
> today, it failed to catch "@gmail.com"
>
> been using it for quite a while, but I'm gonna have to take a good look at 
> it, those two were ridiculously easy to trap for
>
>
> -- 
>
> Steven Green
> Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
>
> http://www.OasisTradingPost.com
>
> Collectibles and Memorabilia
> Vintage Lego Sets and Parts
> - and Paradox support, too
> "Mark Bannister"  wrote in message 
> news:5af59c96$1@pnews.thedbcommunity.com...
>
> That's what I would use.
>
> On 5/11/2018 7:28 AM, Steven Green wrote:
>> "^([^\\@]*)\\@([^\\@.]*).([^\\@]*)$"
>
>>  ^([^\\@]*)\\@([^\\@.]*).([^\\@]*)$
> 


Copyright © 2004 thedbcommunity.com