Paradox Community

Items in pnews.paradox-programming

Subject:Re: advmatch for email
Date:Fri, 11 May 2018 13:06:08 -0500
From:Mark Bannister <markRemove@THISinjection-moldings.com>
Newsgroups:pnews.paradox-programming
It does, I checked it.  Try the form I sent.

On 5/11/2018 12:39 PM, Steven Green wrote:
> failed to be FALSE.. I run that advmatch on large batch emails that 
> Debbie sends out, for trade shows and such, to clean the raw input.. 
> there were 15 of the "@" ones, and 4 of the "dot" ones in an 80,000 
> record table, maybe neither pattern had actually appeared in batches before
> 
> so you think changing all the * to + will take care of it?
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Steven Green
> Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
> 
> http://www.OasisTradingPost.com
> 
> Collectibles and Memorabilia
> Vintage Lego Sets and Parts
> - and Paradox support, too
> "Mark Bannister"  wrote in message 
> news:5af5d1c8$1@pnews.thedbcommunity.com...
> 
> Failed to catch as in those should be considered valid?
> Oh, wait, yes the "*" should be "+"
> ^([^\\@]+)\\@([^\\@.]+).([^\\@]+)$
> 
> On 5/11/2018 11:59 AM, Steven Green wrote:
>> yesterday, it failed to catch "name@gmail."
>>
>> today, it failed to catch "@gmail.com"
>>
>> been using it for quite a while, but I'm gonna have to take a good 
>> look at it, those two were ridiculously easy to trap for
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Steven Green
>> Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
>>
>> http://www.OasisTradingPost.com
>>
>> Collectibles and Memorabilia
>> Vintage Lego Sets and Parts
>> - and Paradox support, too
>> "Mark Bannister"  wrote in message 
>> news:5af59c96$1@pnews.thedbcommunity.com...
>>
>> That's what I would use.
>>
>> On 5/11/2018 7:28 AM, Steven Green wrote:
>>> "^([^\\@]*)\\@([^\\@.]*).([^\\@]*)$"
>>
>>>  ^([^\\@]*)\\@([^\\@.]*).([^\\@]*)$
>>


Copyright © 2004 thedbcommunity.com